Tag Archives: Pierre Colmez

SL_n versus GL_n

I recently wrote a paper (with Toby Gee and George Boxer, see also here) on constructing regular algebraic automorphic representations \(\pi\) of (cohomological) weight zero and level one, and therefore also cuspidal cohomology classes in the cohomology of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbf{Z})\) for … Continue reading

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

30 years of modularity: number theory since the proof of Fermat

It’s probably fair to say that the target audience for this blog is close to orthogonal to the target audience for my talk, but just in case anyone wants to watch it in HD (and with the audio synced to … Continue reading

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

En Passant VI

I just learnt (from a comment on this blog) that Pierre Colmez hosts a wonderful page on Fontaine and Wintenberger here. I particularly recommend reading both the personal recollections of their friends and collaborators (sample quote from Mark: These \(p\)-adic … Continue reading

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jean-Marc Fontaine, 1944-2019

The results which generate the most buzz in mathematics are usually those which can be expressed in an elementary (or at least pithy) way to a general mathematical audience. It is certainly true that such results may be profound (see … Continue reading

Posted in Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments