-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Persiflage on Persiflage, 2012-2024
- Shubhrajit Bhattacharya on Persiflage, 2012-2024
- Persiflage on “Fields of definition”
- Jordan Ellenberg on “Fields of definition”
- Persiflage on “Fields of definition”
Blogroll
Categories
Tags
- Akshay Venkatesh
- Ana Caraiani
- Andrew Wiles
- Bach
- Bao Le Hung
- Barry Mazur
- Class Field Theory
- Coffee
- completed cohomology
- David Geraghty
- David Helm
- Dick Gross
- Galois Representations
- Gauss
- George Boxer
- Gowers
- Grothendieck
- Hilbert modular forms
- Inverse Galois Problem
- Jack Thorne
- James Newton
- Joel Specter
- John Voight
- Jordan Ellenberg
- Ken Ribet
- Kevin Buzzard
- Langlands
- Laurent Clozel
- Mark Kisin
- Matthew Emerton
- Michael Harris
- modular forms
- Patrick Allen
- Peter Scholze
- Richard Moy
- Richard Taylor
- RLT
- Robert Coleman
- Ruochuan Liu
- Serre
- Shiva Chidambaram
- The Hawk
- Toby Gee
- torsion
- Vincent Pilloni
Archives
- December 2024 (2)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- August 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (1)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (7)
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (11)
Meta
Tag Archives: Jean-Pierre Wintenberger
Clozel 70, Part II
Many years ago, Khare asked me (as I think he asked many others at the time) whether I believed their existed an irreducible motive \(M\) over \(\mathbf{Z}\) (so good reduction everywhere) with Hodge-Tate weights \([0,1,2,\ldots,n-1]\) for any \(n > 1\). … Continue reading →
Posted in Mathematics
|
Tagged Andrew Odlyzko, Chandrashekhar Khare, David Geraghty, David Renard, E_8, endoscopy, Gaëtan Chenevier, George Boxer, Harold Stark, Jack Thorne, James Newton, Jean Lannes, Jean-François Mestre, Jean-Marc Fontaine, Jean-Pierre Wintenberger, John Conway, Laurent Clozel, Leech Lattice, Michael Harris, Niemeier Lattices, Olivier Taîbi, Ramanujan's Delta, Stefane Fermigier, Stephen Miller, Toby Gee, Tom Barnet-Lamb
|
6 Comments
30 years of modularity: number theory since the proof of Fermat
It’s probably fair to say that the target audience for this blog is close to orthogonal to the target audience for my talk, but just in case anyone wants to watch it in HD (and with the audio synced to … Continue reading →
Posted in Mathematics
|
Tagged Ana Caraiani, Andrew Wiles, Bach, Barry Mazur, Cello Suites, Chandrashekhar Khare, Christophe Breuil, Documentary, George Boxer, Grothendieck, Hyperbolic Geometry, Jack Thorne, James Newon, Jean-Pierre Wintenberger, John Tate, Knot Not, Langlands, Matthew Emerton, Modularity, Peter Scholze, Pierre Colmez, Thurston, Toby Gee, Vincent Pilloni, Vivaldi
|
13 Comments
Potential Automorphy for GL(n)
Fresh on the arXiv, a nice new paper by Lie Qian proving potential automorphy results for ordinary Galois representations \(\rho: G_F \rightarrow \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbf{Q}_p)\) of regular weight \([0,1,\ldots,n-1]\) for arbitrary CM fields \(F\). The key step in light of the 10-author … Continue reading →
Posted in Mathematics
|
Tagged 10-author paper, Avner Ash, Barnett-Lamb, BLGGT, Chandrashekhar Khare, Dan Grayson, David Geraghty, Dwork, Gerd Faltings, Jean-Pierre Wintenberger, Lie Qian, Michael Harris, Nicholas Shepherd-Barron, Potential Automorphy, Richard Taylor, Serre, Toby Gee, Top, van Geemen
|
1 Comment
En Passant VI
I just learnt (from a comment on this blog) that Pierre Colmez hosts a wonderful page on Fontaine and Wintenberger here. I particularly recommend reading both the personal recollections of their friends and collaborators (sample quote from Mark: These \(p\)-adic … Continue reading →
Posted in Mathematics
|
Tagged Arizona Winter School, Barry Mazur, Jean-Marc Fontaine, Jean-Pierre Wintenberger, John Tate, Mark Kisin, Pierre Colmez
|
Leave a comment
Jean-Marc Fontaine, 1944-2019
The results which generate the most buzz in mathematics are usually those which can be expressed in an elementary (or at least pithy) way to a general mathematical audience. It is certainly true that such results may be profound (see … Continue reading →