-
Recent Posts
- Giving a good mathematics talk
- The Arthurian Legend
- Walter Neumann
- Am I taking students?
- Not quite what I meant
- Persiflage, 2012-2024
- SL_n versus GL_n
- A talk on my new work with Vesselin Dimitrov and Yunqing Tang on irrationality
- Zeilberger + ChatGPT
- Unramified Fontaine-Mazur for representations coming from abelian varieties
Recent Comments
- Kevin Buzzard on The Arthurian Legend
- DH on The Arthurian Legend
- Kevin Buzzard on The Arthurian Legend
- Toy Fan on Giving a good mathematics talk
- Lior Silberman on The Arthurian Legend
Blogroll
Categories
Tags
- Akshay Venkatesh
- Ana Caraiani
- Andrew Wiles
- Bach
- Bao Le Hung
- Barry Mazur
- Beethoven
- Class Field Theory
- Coffee
- completed cohomology
- David Geraghty
- David Helm
- Dick Gross
- Galois Representations
- Gauss
- George Boxer
- Gowers
- Grothendieck
- Hilbert modular forms
- Inverse Galois Problem
- Jack Thorne
- James Newton
- Joel Specter
- John Voight
- Jordan Ellenberg
- Kevin Buzzard
- Langlands
- Laurent Clozel
- Mark Kisin
- Matthew Emerton
- Michael Harris
- modular forms
- Patrick Allen
- Peter Scholze
- Richard Moy
- Richard Taylor
- RLT
- Robert Coleman
- Ruochuan Liu
- Serre
- Shiva Chidambaram
- The Hawk
- Toby Gee
- torsion
- Vincent Pilloni
Archives
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- August 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (1)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (7)
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (11)
Meta
Tag Archives: George Boxer
The Arthurian Legend
Some time back, Kevin Buzzard (friend of the blog!) gave a series of talks in which he criticized certain aspects of the mathematical culture when it came to accepting proof. In addition to obvious targets like the classification of finite … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Alberto Mínguez, Atsushi Ichino, Chaudouard, Fundamental Lemma, George Boxer, Hiraku Atobe, Is this science?, James Arthur, Kevin Buzzard, Laumon, Le Morte d'Arthur, Ngo Bau Chau, Sug Woo Shin, Tasho Kaletha, Toby Gee, Vincent Pilloni, Wee Teck Gan, Weighted Twisted Fundamental Lemma
6 Comments
SL_n versus GL_n
I recently wrote a paper (with Toby Gee and George Boxer, see also here) on constructing regular algebraic automorphic representations \(\pi\) of (cohomological) weight zero and level one, and therefore also cuspidal cohomology classes in the cohomology of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbf{Z})\) for … Continue reading
Posted in Mathematics
Tagged AI, ChatGPT, Gaëtan Chenevier, George Boxer, Go, Grunwald-Wang Theorem, Hilbert modular forms, Jack Thorne, James Newton, Jean-Pierre Labesse, Joachim Schwermer, John Tate, Jürgen Rohlfs, Karen Vogtmann, la langue française, Laurent Clozel, Nasit Darshan, Pierre Colmez, Raghuram, Serre, Serre-Tate Correspondence, Stefan Patrikis, Tate, Toby Gee
1 Comment
Boxes for Boxer update
As noted in this post, exactly 42 reprints of [BCGP] were recovered in January of 2022 from boxes left out in the snow outside Eckhart Hall addressed to George Boxer. As mentioned there, the packaging (5 boxes of 8 plus … Continue reading
Posted in Rant
Tagged George Boxer, Gutenberg bible, IHES, Mystery, Toby Gee, Vincent Pilloni
1 Comment
Potential Modularity of K3 surfaces
This post is to report on results of my student Chao Gu who is graduating this (academic) year. If \(A/F\) is an abelian surface, then one can associate to \(A\) a K3 surface \(X\) (the Kummer surface) by blowing up … Continue reading
Posted in Mathematics, Work of my students
Tagged Chao Gu, George Boxer, Morrison, Picard Group, Picard Rank, Stefan Patrikis, Tate Conjecture, Toby Gee, Vincent Pilloni
2 Comments
Boxes for Boxer
My brother texted me on Monday saying that there were seven (or so) boxes pilled up (outside!) in front of the mathematics department and all addressed to George Boxer. My first thought was that this was a transatlantic move gone … Continue reading