-
Recent Posts
- Giving a good mathematics talk
- The Arthurian Legend
- Walter Neumann
- Am I taking students?
- Not quite what I meant
- Persiflage, 2012-2024
- SL_n versus GL_n
- A talk on my new work with Vesselin Dimitrov and Yunqing Tang on irrationality
- Zeilberger + ChatGPT
- Unramified Fontaine-Mazur for representations coming from abelian varieties
Recent Comments
- DH on The Arthurian Legend
- Kevin Buzzard on The Arthurian Legend
- Toy Fan on Giving a good mathematics talk
- Lior Silberman on The Arthurian Legend
- Anonymous on The Arthurian Legend
Blogroll
Categories
Tags
- Akshay Venkatesh
- Ana Caraiani
- Andrew Wiles
- Bach
- Bao Le Hung
- Barry Mazur
- Beethoven
- Class Field Theory
- Coffee
- completed cohomology
- David Geraghty
- David Helm
- Dick Gross
- Galois Representations
- Gauss
- George Boxer
- Gowers
- Grothendieck
- Hilbert modular forms
- Inverse Galois Problem
- Jack Thorne
- James Newton
- Joel Specter
- John Voight
- Jordan Ellenberg
- Kevin Buzzard
- Langlands
- Laurent Clozel
- Mark Kisin
- Matthew Emerton
- Michael Harris
- modular forms
- Patrick Allen
- Peter Scholze
- Richard Moy
- Richard Taylor
- RLT
- Robert Coleman
- Ruochuan Liu
- Serre
- Shiva Chidambaram
- The Hawk
- Toby Gee
- torsion
- Vincent Pilloni
Archives
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- August 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (1)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (7)
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (11)
Meta
Tag Archives: Deuring
Correspondance Serre-Tate, Part I
Reading the correspondence between Serre and Tate has been as delightful as one could expect. What is very nice to see — although perhaps not so surprising — is the utter delight that both Serre and Tate find in discussing … Continue reading
Posted in Mathematics
Tagged 118982593, 144169, 3457, 691, 97, Deuring, minus part, Mumford, Odlyzko, plus part, Rene Schoof, Serre, Serre-Tate Correspondence, Tate, Tate Conjecture
Leave a comment