Jerry Wang gave a nice talk this week on his generalization of Manjul’s work on pointless hyperelliptic curves to hyperelliptic curves with no points over any field of odd degree (equivalently, \(\mathrm{Pic}^1\) is pointless). This work (link here) is joint with Manjul and Dick, so the exposition is predictably of high quality. But I wanted to mention a result that arose during the talk which I found quite intriguing. Namely, given the intersection \(X\) of two quadrics \(P\) and \(Q\) in projective (2n+1)-space, the variety of projective n-spaces passing through \(X\) turns out (over the complex numbers) to be an abelian variety. For \(n = 1\) this is pretty familiar, but, for general \(n\), I hadn’t seen any construction like this before. It gives, for example, explicit constructions of equations for abelian varieties in surprisingly low degree. It brought me back to a lecture I once went to by Beauville as a graduate student when he talked about intermediate Jacobians (wait – perhaps this construction also has to be isomorphic to an intermediate Jacobian…). Is it possible (in some weak sense) to classify all varieties whose variety of maximal linear subspaces is an abelian variety of suitably high dimension? Are there varieties in which this construction gives rise to abelian varieties which are not isogenous to Jacobians? The geometric result is due (independently) to several authors, but, in a solo paper here, Jerry showed that the result is true arithmetically, and, even better, the construction can more precisely be described as giving an explicit torsor for the corresponding Jacobian. This very nicely generalizes the classical picture between pairs of quadrics and 2- and 4-descent.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Persiflage on Persiflage, 2012-2024
- Shubhrajit Bhattacharya on Persiflage, 2012-2024
- Persiflage on “Fields of definition”
- Jordan Ellenberg on “Fields of definition”
- Persiflage on “Fields of definition”
Blogroll
Categories
Tags
- Akshay Venkatesh
- Ana Caraiani
- Andrew Wiles
- Bach
- Bao Le Hung
- Barry Mazur
- Class Field Theory
- Coffee
- completed cohomology
- David Geraghty
- David Helm
- Dick Gross
- Galois Representations
- Gauss
- George Boxer
- Gowers
- Grothendieck
- Hilbert modular forms
- Inverse Galois Problem
- Jack Thorne
- James Newton
- Joel Specter
- John Voight
- Jordan Ellenberg
- Ken Ribet
- Kevin Buzzard
- Langlands
- Laurent Clozel
- Mark Kisin
- Matthew Emerton
- Michael Harris
- modular forms
- Patrick Allen
- Peter Scholze
- Richard Moy
- Richard Taylor
- RLT
- Robert Coleman
- Ruochuan Liu
- Serre
- Shiva Chidambaram
- The Hawk
- Toby Gee
- torsion
- Vincent Pilloni
Archives
- December 2024 (2)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- August 2024 (1)
- July 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- May 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (1)
- October 2023 (2)
- September 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (4)
- November 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (2)
- June 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (5)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (3)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (5)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (3)
- September 2018 (1)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (3)
- May 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (2)
- October 2016 (3)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- May 2016 (3)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (4)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (2)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (5)
- December 2014 (2)
- November 2014 (2)
- October 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (6)
- August 2014 (7)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (2)
- December 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (7)
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (2)
- January 2013 (6)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (11)
Meta
Dear Persiflage,
I cannot resist mentioning my favorite example of this kind of construction, which relates to smooth hyperplane sections H of G(4,8). H has dimension 15; it has primitive cohomology only in the middle degree, which gives a Hodge structure of dimension 6 and level 1. Thus the intermediate Jacobian is a PPAV.
Over the complex numbers, the PPAV which arise this way are exactly the Jacobians of the non-hyperelliptic curves X of genus 3. What about over a general field K of characteristic zero? Then the Jacobian of X arises from a K-rational hyperplane section exactly when the curve X has a K-rational flex in the canonical embedding.
The variety of P^n-1’s in X is indeed an intermediate Jacobian – see e.g. this nice paper: http://archive.numdam.org/article/ASNSP_1980_4_7_2_217_0.pdf